What you see isn’t always what you get: Auditory word signals trump consciously perceived words in lexical access

What you see/what you get.

What You See Is What You Get

This paper corrects three widely held misunderstandings about Maxent when used in common sense reasoning: That it is language dependent; That it produces objective facts; That it subsumes, and so is at least as untenable as, the paradox-ridden Principle of Insufficient Reason.

Haptic Illusions: What You Feel Isn’t Always What You Get

In this paper, we present the discovery of new haptic illusions, and a method for creating further haptic illusions. Pure haptic illusions were created by mixing force cues with geometric cues to make people feel shapes that differ from the actual shape of the object. In particular, we found that an area that feels harder to move through and easier to move out of can be interpreted as a region ...

Commentary: intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography: what you see is not always what you get.

We review insights from computational studies of affinities of ligands binding to proteins. The power of structural biology is in translating knowledge of protein structures into insights about their forces, binding, and mechanisms. However, the complementary power of computer modeling is in showing "the rest of the story" (i.e., how motions and ensembles and alternative conformers and the entr...

Neurotoxic protein oligomers--what you see is not always what you get.

An increasing body of evidence suggests that soluble assemblies of amyloid proteins are the predominant neurotoxic species in many amyloid-related diseases. Consequently, the focus of research on pathologic mechanisms underlying amyloidoses has shifted from amyloid fibrils to oligomers. Biophysical characterization of oligomers is difficult due to their metastable nature. The most popular exper...